№2. Name in one word: a) the act of agreeing that smth is good =
b) a piece of information, spoken or written, passed from one person to another =
c) an identifying symbol used as a trademark =
d) a large business organization =
e) one who buys and uses goods and services =
f) the exclusive right to reproduce, publish, and sell an original work, or any part of t, for a certain number of years =
g) a person using the services of a lawyer, architect, or other professional person =
h) relating to the arts of representation, decorating,, and printing on a flat surfaces =

everything that is most valuable from a literary point of view has been translated to Russian language, but everything else is not worth to learn a second language. And such people are the vast majority. But I think that if you really want to learn or not to learn a foreign language, you need to consult someone who knows at least one language apart from their mother. Why? Because it is strange to ask about the benefits and values of a foreign language in the one who does not know and therefore not able to assess the benefits that the person gains through such knowledge.

Many people are "perfectly" do without the knowledge of foreign languages, I do not feel there is no need. They may say,that the most valuable from a literary point of view, it has been translated into Russian, and the rest is not worth it for the sake of this study a second language. And the vast majority of people. But I believe that if you really want to know whether or not to study a foreign language, you have to appeal to those who know at least one language in addition to their mother. Why is that? Because the country asking about the benefits and value of foreign language from someone who does not know him and therefore not able to assess the benefits that a person acquires through such knowledge