3. Are the statements true or false? e.g. He asked her how often she bought books. 1. He wanted to know how often she read historical fiction. 2. He asked her what she was reading at that moment. 3. The man asked the woman how often she went to the cinema. 4. He asked her if she had seen The Lords of the Rings films. 5. He asked her whether she preferred reading books or watching TV.
If we are only talking about crossing the ocean, then personally I would have swum it three times. For example, if you start from a point in Eurasia, you can go to Africa without crossing the ocean. From Africa to cross the ocean for the first time to Australia. Then swim a second time and visit Antarctica. From Antarctica we are sailing to South America for the third time. And from there, through the Panama Canal, we get to the North.
If you wish, you can and only once swim across, given that Australia and Antarctica, like Antarctica and South America, are separated not by oceans, but by bays and seas.
1. It flows from history, I think. During World War II America and Russia were allies. So the newspapers reported that Russians are hardworking, radical because of the political system and brave because of the way they protected their country. But things had changed by the end of the war. The USA and the USSR had varied in their opinions, and then propaganda stepped in.
2. Personally I disagree with this statement because there are lots of ambitious people here who are willing to get to new tops in different spheres. I don't think that it is changing because everybody here wants to live comfortably.
3. I think it depends on the person. It's not some kind of national feature but the personal choice.
4. I am concerned that it can be really exhausting because it's just too much. There are some personal problems which mustn't be shared due to their moral load.
5. I think that equality is important everywhere in the world and it's the ideal of absolute majority of people. But nowadays we live in capitalistic reality so the principle of equality takes a back seat somehow.
Объяснение:
If we are only talking about crossing the ocean, then personally I would have swum it three times. For example, if you start from a point in Eurasia, you can go to Africa without crossing the ocean. From Africa to cross the ocean for the first time to Australia. Then swim a second time and visit Antarctica. From Antarctica we are sailing to South America for the third time. And from there, through the Panama Canal, we get to the North.
If you wish, you can and only once swim across, given that Australia and Antarctica, like Antarctica and South America, are separated not by oceans, but by bays and seas.
1. It flows from history, I think. During World War II America and Russia were allies. So the newspapers reported that Russians are hardworking, radical because of the political system and brave because of the way they protected their country. But things had changed by the end of the war. The USA and the USSR had varied in their opinions, and then propaganda stepped in.
2. Personally I disagree with this statement because there are lots of ambitious people here who are willing to get to new tops in different spheres. I don't think that it is changing because everybody here wants to live comfortably.
3. I think it depends on the person. It's not some kind of national feature but the personal choice.
4. I am concerned that it can be really exhausting because it's just too much. There are some personal problems which mustn't be shared due to their moral load.
5. I think that equality is important everywhere in the world and it's the ideal of absolute majority of people. But nowadays we live in capitalistic reality so the principle of equality takes a back seat somehow.