Hello. i am the daughter of the recruit, and i just do not want my father went to war. tell me - for what, and for whom! for those moneybags (derogatory name of the richest people in the government). sorry, i do live in a quiet town in a quiet village. and my father went and shot his brothers (the meaning is difficult to decipher, like the following, "i am outraged by the fact that his father is sent to kill their brothers")! we stand at the grave of their grandfathers and great-grandfathers who fought for the peaceful sky over your head! now what ? ! (applause) now our uncle, fathers, grandfathers, go and fight, just (the word does not bear the semantic load - emotions), for those people snickering! excuse me please (in the sense of "one may want to say"), the war did not start those guys who stand behind me, and those who have a lot of money, and the ones that are doing now in this war a huge fortune. for my father will now fight ? ! (applause) what do ! ? do you know what the most offensive? my great-grandfather saw the war, the great-grandmother saw the war - and now what? (offer more carrying emotional burden than semantic) what's on tv right now? i'm a journalist, i am on the 2nd course, and teachers tell us: - "children (students - in this sense), not watching tv, talking a civil war! war is not between people, and between governments. and every television (the meaning is the same as the "per channel") on each channel - whether it is civil (tv), central, our, regional, - there is shown only propaganda! "russia shows one thing, ukraine shows another (most likely the girl reinsured - because of the sbu, the analogue of the gestapo - watching people, and we must show that in russia not everything is transparent on television. otherwise, it may simply be eliminated). tv5 - poroshenko this channel! there do not you say that poroshenko, it's full of shit (a dirty word for feces), which for the grandmother (money) is ready for everything ! (applause) it will not show on tv, because it's his channel (channel). and this state of affairs with almost all tv channels. just want to say one thing - it's not that we brewed and will disentangle the usual normal men. if the war will affect our region, then my father would go, and will tear the back will break with all the skin. first of all, for me, my sister, my mother and all the others (screams from the crowd) then we all go! (girl again) then everyone will go, because there are women, there are men who are willing to fight only for his family, but not for those moneybags (meaning poroshenko and his entourage) "
Nowadays friends play a very important role in a person's life. Some people think that it is impossible to live without friends while others believe that friends are not the most important thing in life. Who is right? The question is controversial. Now I am going to express my point of view and debate with my opponents.
I strongly believe that friendship yields benefits to a person. Firstly, friendship satisfies our need for socializing. There are things that are more interesting to do with someone else, such as going to a cafe, doing shopping, or travelling to the seaside. Secondly, your friends can significantly influence your outlook — through communication, discussion of interests and events, you will learn a lot and improve your knowledge. Thirdly, friends help people to overcome life's challenges that are difficult for them to cope with on their own.
However, there is another opinion that friendship just brings trouble. To begin with, often people's opinions on an important issue may not coincide. If you suddenly quarrel, you will have to seek a compromise and be able to yield to your friends when necessary. Also, the closer a person is to you, the worse he or she is able to offend you. So when you make friends you take certain risks.
Undoubtedly, there are disadvantages in friendship. Yet, I insist that every person is afraid of possible loneliness. True friendship makes you feel needed.
In conclusion, I can say that if you have at least one friend, you can call yourself a happy person.
Nowadays friends play a very important role in a person's life. Some people think that it is impossible to live without friends while others believe that friends are not the most important thing in life. Who is right? The question is controversial. Now I am going to express my point of view and debate with my opponents.
I strongly believe that friendship yields benefits to a person. Firstly, friendship satisfies our need for socializing. There are things that are more interesting to do with someone else, such as going to a cafe, doing shopping, or travelling to the seaside. Secondly, your friends can significantly influence your outlook — through communication, discussion of interests and events, you will learn a lot and improve your knowledge. Thirdly, friends help people to overcome life's challenges that are difficult for them to cope with on their own.
However, there is another opinion that friendship just brings trouble. To begin with, often people's opinions on an important issue may not coincide. If you suddenly quarrel, you will have to seek a compromise and be able to yield to your friends when necessary. Also, the closer a person is to you, the worse he or she is able to offend you. So when you make friends you take certain risks.
Undoubtedly, there are disadvantages in friendship. Yet, I insist that every person is afraid of possible loneliness. True friendship makes you feel needed.
In conclusion, I can say that if you have at least one friend, you can call yourself a happy person.