In countries around the world, a child must be above a certain age before they can be charged with a criminal offence. This 'age of criminal responsibility', varies considerably. For example, In England, children are considered responsible for all illegal acts once they reach the age of 10. In Belgium, individuals are 18 before they reach the age of criminal responsibility. In the USA, it is up to a judge to decide whether or not a child can be held responsible for a crime. How is an 'age of criminal responsibility' decided? Well, roughly speaking, it is taken to be the age when a child knows the difference between right and wrong. Every country agrees that children are not capable of understanding the difference between right and wrong below a certain age. But they strongly disagree on what this age is.
Pinpointing the age at which children have learnt the difference between right and wrong is difficult. For example, how old are children when they understand that something is seriously wrong as opposed to simply naughty? Moreover, how old are children when they are able to understand the consequences of their actions? This is important because the law states that a person must understand the possible consequences of an action in order to be held responsible for it.
In countries like England where the age of criminal responsibility is low, many people argue that it should be raised. They point out that it does not make sense to say that a child is mature enough to be put into an adult prison at the age of 10, but is not mature enough to drive, marry or vote for another 8 years.
By contrast, people who want the age of criminal responsibility to stay low say that raising the age would lead to higher levels of crime. They also argue that a low age of criminal responsibility makes children realise that committing a crime is a serious offence.
Historically, one of the main reasons for introducing an age of criminal responsibility was that severe penalties were handed out for even the smallest of crimes. In medieval England for instance, a person could be hanged for stealing a sheep. As children were also treated in the same harsh way as adults when they broke the law, it was thought necessary to protect them from inappropriate punishments.
составить десять типов вопросов
Moreover, the essential drawback of these meals is that they contain too much saturated animal fats, which put a heavy load on the liver, contribute to hypertension, vascular occlusion and building up cholesterol plaques.
For reasons of economy, fast-food establishments use cheap fat substitutes called margarines which are especially dangerous because they contain trans fats that are harmful for heart and even, according to some reports, causing cancer.
According to WHO, the safe usage of trans fats for a man is less than 1% of the total meal, while the portion of French fries contains 30-40% of such fats.
Moreover, the essential drawback of these meals is that they contain too much saturated animal fats, which put a heavy load on the liver, contribute to hypertension, vascular occlusion and building up cholesterol plaques.
For reasons of economy, fast-food establishments use cheap fat substitutes called margarines which are especially dangerous because they contain trans fats that are harmful for heart and even, according to some reports, causing cancer.
According to WHO, the safe usage of trans fats for a man is less than 1% of the total meal, while the portion of French fries contains 30-40% of such fats.