ОТВЕТИТЬ НА ВОПРОСЫ ПО ТЕКСТУ. When the world was at a very primitive stage of development there were no laws to regulate life of people. If a man chose to kill his wife that was hisown business and no one interfered officially.
But things never stay the same. The life has changed. We live in a complicated world. Scientific and social developments increase the tempo of our daily living activities. Now we need rules and regulations which govern our every social move and action. We have made laws of community living.
Though laws are based on the reasonable needs of the community we often don’t notice them. If our neighbour plays loud music late at night, we probably try to discuss the matter with him rather than consulting the police, the lawyer or the courts. When we buy a TV set, or a train ticket or loan money to somebody a lawyer may tell us it represents a contract with legal obligations. But to most of us it is just a ticket that gets us on a train or a TV set to watch.
Only when a neighbour refuses to behave reasonably or when we are injured in a train accident, the money wasn’t repaid, the TV set fails to work and the owner of the shop didn’t return money or replace it, we do start thinking about the legal implications of everyday activities.
Some transactions in modern society are so complex that few of us would risk making them without first seeking legal advice. For example, buying or selling a house, setting up a business, or deciding whom to give our property to when we die.
On the whole it seems that people all over the world are becoming more and more accustomed to using legal means to regulate their relations with each other. Multinational companies employ lawyers to ensure that their contracts are valid whenever they do business.
1. Were there any laws when the world was at a very primitive stage of development?
2. Why do we need rules and regulations nowadays?
3. Do we notice laws? Why?
4. When do we start thinking about the legal implications of our everyday activities?
5. In what cases do people seek legal advice?
6. Why do companies employ lawyers?
this house-these houses
that potato-those potatoes
that city-those cities
this woman-these women
Объяснение:
this+ сущ. в ед. числе- этот дом this house
these+суш.во мн. числе-these houses
that + сущ.в ед.числе- that house тот дом
those+сущ.во м.числе. Those houses- те дома
woman (вумэн) во мн.числе будет women (вимэн), форма womans- не правельная, потому что если говорят woman's bag то переводится как сумка женщины (сумка принадлежит женщине), поэтому во множественном числе будет women, чтобы не было недорозумений в понимании
If I do this test, I will improve my English.
If I find your ring, I will give it back to you.
Peggy will go shopping if she has time in the afternoon.
Simon will go to London next week if he gets a cheap flight.
If her boyfriend doesn't phone today, she will leave him.
If they don't study harder, they won't pass the exam.
If it rains tomorrow, I won't have to water the plants.
You won't be able to sleep if you watch this scary film.
Susan won't able to move into the new house if it isn't ready on time.
She will stay in London if she gets a job.
I will buy a new dress if I have enough money.
She will take a taxi if it rains.