Read the article and answer the questions. Competing for Resources
The resources of any one environment are limited. Depending on which plants and animals share the environment, there may not be enough of everything to go around. All organisms need water, food and shelter to stay alive. These resources are beneficial, which means they are good for the organisms. When an environment is low on any of these things, organisms must compete for them. Those who get to the resources first have the best chance of survival. Being without water, food or shelter for very long is detrimental, which means it is harmful to organisms.
The resources in an area determine how big the plant and animal populations can be. Sometimes there are too many living things in an area. The weakest of the populations will not be able to get the resources they need. As the weak die out, the populations get smaller. Finally, the area’s resources recover and can support them again.
Sometimes people will capture members of large animal populations and move them. They take them to another location with less competition. This helps the animals survive.
Sometimes the government will allow hunting of large animal populations. Deer and rabbits can be a good food source for people. When there are too many of these animals in an area, They sometimes come into the cities looking for food. They often cause trouble. Hunting keeps the number of animals under control.
Answer the questions.
1) Why do organisms sometimes have to compete for resources?
2) What kinds of things are beneficial for organisms?
3) What happens when populations grow too large for an area?

So...De-extinction is the process of creating an organism which is – or greatly resembles – a member of an extinct species (1). Contemporary biotechnology offers various promising alternatives for achieving this purpose, including the techniques that have already been applied to preserving endangered species (2). De-extinction requires an in-depth study of the biophysical conditions where the species can live and reproduce in relation to other species – including humans – and adapt to the environmental changes. In any case, risk and harm evaluation on the impact of the “re-birth” of species is necessary. There is a number of crucial ethical issues concerning de-extinction. They include the meanings of concepts such as “nature,” “species,” “evolution,” “biodiversity,” “death,” and “wildlife” in relation to human behavior and human impact on nature (3). In 2013, de-extinction became popular through press and public events; the National Geographic devoted a cover story to this topic and presented various possibilities and scenarios about the most suitable candidates. The Revive & Restore network, with the support of TED and in partnership with the National Geographic Society, convened the TEDxDeExtinction conference bringing together conservationists, genetic technology practitioners, scientists, and ethicists (http://www.ted.com/tedx/events/7650). Because the revival of extinct animals inspires imagination (4), de-extinction has been a topic of science fiction novels, such as John Brosnan’s Carnosaur (1984) and Michael Crichton’s Jurassic Park (1990) and their film adaptations.

Following a systematic philosophical and ethical analysis on animal de-extinction in the context of ecological restoration (3), this article analyzes de-extinction from the standpoint of bio-objectification and considers how de-extinction is a case of bio-objectification.

I chose the second picture. The second picture shows little Red riding hood and a Gray wolf. The wolf wants to eat little Red riding hood. And little Red riding hood wants to take pies to her grandmother. On the way, she meets a Gray wolf. She told him where she was going. The gray wolf ran to her grandmother. The gray wolf ate grandma before little Red riding hood came. Next, the Gray wolf eats little Red riding hood, the hunter comes. He ripped open the belly of a Gray wolf, and little Red riding hood and her grandmother jumped out. The end.

Объяснение:

ПЕРЕВОД

Я выбрал вторую картинку. На второй картинке изображены Красная шапочка и Серый волк. Волк хочет съесть Красную шапочку. А Красная шапочка хочет отнести своей бабушке пирожки. По дороге она встречает Серого волка. Она сказала ему куда она спешит. Серый волк помчался к её бабушке. Серый волк съел бабушку до того как пришла Красная шапочка. Далее Серый волк съедает Красную шапочку, приходит охотник. Он вспорол брюхо Серому волку, и от туда выскочили Красная шапочка и её бабушка. Конец.

Выпиши то что тебе нужно