Write questions for the answers.
a) q: what does jim support?
a: jim supports local shops and businesses.
b) q: who does run the environmental group?
a: lilian runs the environmental group.
c) q: where
a: the protestors are marching to the white house.
d) q: who
a: the president spoke to the crowd.
e) q: whose
a: andy borrowed my car.

The conversation usually involves frankness. No wonder there was an application to the conversation - "talk heart to heart." This puts the two conversations in the position of equality. Observing the same (method of psychological research) in a conversation is already "a third person" who is watching the conversation by making fixation on certain moments, analysis, evaluation and so on. E., T. E., An additional factor influencing the conversation and making use of a method of psychological research corrective "net effect" of the conversation. Unless, of course, this method is not applicable professional psychologist, who this method of psychological research is automatically activated when "spiritual conversation" and tselenopravlenno when he interviewed for a particular result. In this and the benefits (ie. E. To bring an "object" to the spiritual conversation ") and disadvantages of the conversation as a method of psychological research, t. To. In this case it turns into" experience "observe the test;))

1) Would you like something to eat? - No, thanks. I've just had lunch. (just/have)

2) Do you know where Julia is? - Yes, I've (=I have) just seen her.
3) What time is David leaving? – He's (=He has) already left. 
4) What's in the newspaper today? - I don't know. I haven't read yet.
5) Is Ann coming to the cinema with us?- No, she has already seen the film.
6) Are your friends here yet? - Yes, they have just arrived.
7) What does Tim think about your plan? - I haven't been told yet. (Мне ещё он не сказал) Или I haven't told yet (Я ещё не сказал ему) - не знаю, что здесь имеется в виду